← Zhonghui Consulting中文版知识库 →
Home › FAQ Knowledge Base › ODI vs Article 37 Filing: Corporate vs Individual Overseas Investment

ODI vs Article 37 Filing: Corporate vs Individual Overseas Investment

Reviewed by Dilys Deng · ICPA Chartered AccountantLast reviewed: 2026-10-18
SHORT ANSWER

ODI filing is for companies investing overseas; Article 37 (SAFE) registration is for Chinese individuals investing through offshore SPVs. If both corporate and individual shareholders sit in the structure, both registrations must be done in a coordinated order.

The key distinction: ODI is the corporate track (NDRC + MOFCOM + SAFE-bank), while Article 37 refers to SAFE Circular Huifa [2014] No.37 — individual registration for residents who establish or control offshore special purpose vehicles (SPVs) for financing or investment. Common mistake: founders register the company's ODI but ignore their own Article 37 obligations, then cannot legally receive dividends or return funds. Correct sequence matters — typically the individual registers first or in parallel, since some banks ask for 37 registration evidence when processing related transactions. Zhonghui handles both tracks and the coordination between them.

Related questions

What Is ODI Filing in China? Outbound Direct Investment Explained Who Needs ODI Filing? Thresholds and Exemptions for Chinese Companies How Long Does ODI Filing Take? Realistic Timeline for 2026

Need this handled end-to-end?

Zhonghui Consulting's ICPA-licensed team has formed and maintains entities in 20+ jurisdictions for Chinese groups and their offshore structures. Free diagnosis, fixed-fee delivery.

Get a Free Compliance Diagnosis →
Book 15-min